Coherence Film Inhaltsangabe & Details
Em, Kevin, Mike, Beth, Amir, Laurie, Hugh und Lee haben sich seit einer ganzen Weile nicht gesehen. Die alten Bekannten versprechen sich folglich viel von dem gemeinsamen Abend. Sogar ein Komet zieht seine Bahn über dem Haus, in dem die acht. Coherence – Nichts ist Zufall (Originaltitel: Coherence) ist ein US-amerikanischer Science-Fiction-Film des Regisseurs James Ward Byrkit aus dem Jahr Coherence ein Film von James Ward Byrkit mit Nicholas Brendon, Hugo Armstrong. Inhaltsangabe: Acht Freunde (unter anderem Emily Baldoni, Maury Sterling. An diesem Film scheiden sich wieder die Geister, wie man auch anhand der und sich darauf einlassen konnte, könnte auch an "Coherence" Gefallen finden. Ein astrologisches Phänomen bringt das Leben von acht Freunden in dem Sci-Fi-Film Coherence völlig durcheinander. Komplette Handlung und Informationen zu. COHERENCE “Nichts ist Zufall” Ab auf DVD & Blu-ray. „Einer der besten Science-Fiction-Filme. Der Horror der Existenz. Coherence beginnt wie so viele andere kleine amerikanische Independent-Filme. Eine Gruppe von Freunden trifft sich.
Coherence Film Stáblista: Video
COHERENCE MOVIE EXPLAINED
Coherence Film - Statistiken
Bewerte : 0. Weiter lässt sich fragen, warum neben dem Ausfall von Handy und Internet sie nicht die möglich diskutieren, in einer der anderen offensichtlich unbeleuchteten Häuser einzudringen? Dirk Westervelt.Strange things begin to happen when a group of friends gather for a dinner party on an evening when a comet is passing overhead.
Director: James Ward Byrkit. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic. Science Fiction. Films I Watched in October Share this Rating Title: Coherence 7.
Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Edit Cast Cast overview: Emily Baldoni Em as Emily Foxler Maury Sterling Kevin Nicholas Brendon Mike Lorene Scafaria Lee Elizabeth Gracen Beth Hugo Armstrong Hugh Alex Manugian Amir Lauren Maher Laurie Aqueela Zoll Extra Carrie Patterson Extra Kelly Donovan Extra Alexis Boozer Sterling Extra as Alexis Boozer Mark Ballou Edit Storyline On the night of an astronomical anomaly, eight friends at a dinner party experience a troubling chain of reality bending events.
Taglines: Nothing is random. Edit Did You Know? Trivia According to Emily Baldoni , after the first mysterious thumping on the "door to nowhere", the actors were both scared and very excited about the story that was unfolding.
We just didn't have any clue. Goofs at around 1h 6 mins When Hugh is calculating the different outcomes on his iPhone, you can see from the display that he has reception - which they claim none of them has.
Quotes [ first lines ] Kevin : [ on the phone ] I felt like I had a lot of time. Em : I know. It's good. I wonder if I can start out this review by ripping off a previous review I did for a little gem of a movie called The Incident, by pointing out what is the exact image that comes to mind when you hear the term 'science fiction'.
You know, thing set in space or different planets, with a wide variety of creatures and species completely unlike our own. And that's not a wrong image to have of sci-fi, of course, since that is what the genre has been pushed as throughout the years.
You can explore all of these themes without, really, relying much on the usage of special effects. All you need is strong dialogue and a strong cast able to carry the load of those really complex themes and have them not overwhelm you with a bunch of information that you're meant to process in a very little amount of time.
As much as I appreciate the big, special-effects driven space operas, I think a bigger part of me appreciates the smaller films that don't use the smoke and mirrors.
That, instead, focus on crafting interesting characters first, to help carry the load of their narrative, whatever form that narrative may take and whatever themes they choose to explore.
These are small, independent films that, in spite of their lack of a major budget, succeeded in creating a believable world that explored interesting scientific themes through the use of dialogue and character development.
This movie, to me, also fits that bill perfectly. What's even more impressive is the fact that the movie, for the most part was improvised. As I understand it, the actors were given basic outlines for their characters, motivations and major plot points.
Going even further into that, for each day of filming, the actors would get notes for their specific characters, from backstory or more about their motivations.
None of the actors were aware what the other received so, because of this, a lot of the reactions you see in the movie are real reactions. And, I don't know, there's just something so appealing about that to me.
Like, as a viewer, I am able to completely invest myself in these characters if I know that, at the very least, the actors believe it and they're into what they're doing.
Believability is key in movies like this. I can imagine if this movie had been as tightly scripted, plotted and rehearsed as, say, a Tarantino film, the reactions would not have come across as authentic as they did.
And this movie would have definitely suffered for it. That's not to say that Tarantino has an inferior style, it's just that with his movies being the way they are, massive in scale and length, they need to be scripted that way.
I'm just using him as a point of comparison. I think the thing most people will notice, right out of the gate, on top of the obvious multiple realities of the same dinner party and the same people converging and existing at the same time as this comet passes close to earth, is just how good the acting is.
Top to bottom, the acting is absolutely top-notch and, say what you will about this movie, but no one can take that away from them.
If you disagree, then there's just something wrong with you, my dude. This is, definitely, very much inspired by The Twilight Zone and it just gives you that weird, twisty vibe that the show so expertly captured.
I don't think I could do the movie's themes justice, but let's see what I can do. So, basically, this comet is passing really close to earth and as it does strange things start happening.
I'm not even really gonna go into that much detail, but eventually the group find out that, somehow, someway, the comet has caused them and other, alternate versions of them from a different reality, to coexist at the same time.
Basically, almost every version of them is having this dinner party and a fair share of them are aware that there are other versions of themselves in this world.
The movie has a lot of interesting ideas that it explores, but one of the ones I like the most is this idea of, basically, attacking and, maybe, murdering an alternate version of yourself because you don't know if they're about to do the same exact thing to you.
That type of paranoia, particularly when, in this case, it's regarding another version of you is really interesting. Like what would drive someone to even think of that?
Though, to be fair, I think Mike is the only one that has the idea of killing the other version of themselves.
It's just still interesting to me to explore that dynamic of wanting to kill another version of yourself that you don't actually know.
Yet, in fact, you do know, because they're pretty much the same person as you, it's just that the exist in another reality. It's nuts, but I just like that.
And, of course, the movie covers much more than this, but that's one of the things that jumped out at me from this movie.
This paranoia bleeds into paranoia of the other people around you, who may not be the ones that you originally went to dinner with.
Basically, there's this dark zone and, Em theorizes, when you go through this zone, it's like a roulette wheel, when you come back out of it and you go back to the house, you may not even come back to the same reality as the one you're originally from.
So, again, that creates a lot of mistrust and tension between the group. Tension that, in my opinion, shouldn't be there, given that, in spite of everything, these are just different versions of the same person.
But, at the same time, given the situation of everything that is going on, you can't blame them for reacting the way they have.
To discover that there are, seemingly, endless versions of yourself, all existing in the same place at the same time, that's a lot of stuff to take in.
These arguments and tense moments were, really, just bound to happen. I think that's about all of the narrative elements that I'm going into, I just think that most of it is better if you go in blind.
Though, again, I'm certain I spoiled some of those someone who might have bumped into this review ha! This is not an infallible movie, no flick is, of course.
I think there are some moments that some people feel lack, ummm, coherence. And they're not wrong, there's just moments in the film, where all the actors are yelling at once and stuff happens so quickly that, honestly, you're not entirely sure what just happened and what you're supposed to glean from that particular scene.
I suppose this could be by design, in that you're as confused and out of it as the characters themselves, but I felt it could have been handled better.
That's just me, though. And, quite frankly, it's an insanely minor complaint, because I really enjoyed this movie a lot.
Its improvisational and naturalistic acting is to be commended, it's an incredibly intelligent movie that treats its audience like adults, it doesn't hold your hand in the slightest.
I think we need more movies like this, honestly. Movies that try to push the sci-fi genre towards places it doesn't normally go.
This isn't gonna be everyone's cup of tea, of course, like if you're more of a casual person, who enjoys the space operas, this movie is gonna be like jumping headfirst into an empty pool.
But it is a very rewarding and highly enjoyable experience and I'm glad to have watched this. Jesse O Super Reviewer.
Jan 17, Much has been said about Karyn Kusuma's dark mystery The Invitation in It became the dinner party thriller that people were talking about yet James Ward Byrkit's Coherence which was first released two years earlier went largely unnoticed.
It did gather some positive word-of-mouth around the festival circuit but this film was more dynamic and much more deserving of a wider audience. Plot: A group of friends meet for an evening of chow and chat on the night that a passing comet flies close to the earth's atmosphere.
It's an event that hasn't happened for decades but also has the possibilities of some strange events occurring.
The friends soon discover that they might be living in an alternate reality as fear and paranoia creep into their increasingly fraught and tension filled dinner party.
With this in mind, Coherence has a very strong chance of being an absolute disaster and a word of warning to all budding filmmakers in what not to do.
However, it's quite the opposite. Byrkit shows what the possibilities are when the writing is strong and you have a confidence in your approach.
He has a fine and steady hand with his direction and delivers a taught, intelligent and hugely involving mystery in his feature debut.
Coherence really has no right in being as good as it is but it absolutely works. It's strengths lie in treating the audience with respect and you're left in a position where you have to return the favour.
It earns it as it demands your attention to keep up with the twisted and, sometimes confusing, plot developments.
That said, Byrkit doesn't want to leave any of his audience behind, so he does take the time to explain his scientific and philosophical theories but he never loses sight of the film's brisk pace and he doesn't forget that the film is essentially a complex puzzle.
And a very good one at that. There are some minor plot discrepancies here and there but these do not overshadow the sheer brilliance and execution of its genuis science fiction concept.
A remarkably assured debut from a promising new directorial talent. Months and months of tracking fractured realities, looking up what actual scientists believe about the nature of reality — Schrödinger's cat and all that.
It was research, but despite all the graphs and charts, I think our whole idea was that it has to be character-based. We want the logic of our internal rules to be sound, and we wanted it to be something people could watch 12 times and still discover a new layer.
The movie cuts to black at , , , , , , , , , , , , , and The movie's director has said those cuts signify something, but hasn't said what they signify.
There was no cut to black around , which was the point of divergence between realities, although the house was plunged into darkness due to an electricity cut.
There was no cut to black at , when the characters all switched from a house without a broken glass to a house with a broken glass, and there was no cut to black at , when only Mike switched to a different reality.
Byrkit intentionally chose actors who did not know each other. He told an interviewer that, after working on blockbuster films such as Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl , "I come from theater where I was trained to really just concentrate on story and character on a stage with actors and so I was craving getting rid of everything, getting rid of the crew; getting rid of script, no special effects, no support, no money, no nothing, and just getting back to the purity of that, of a camera in your hand and some actress actors?
But they wouldn't know what the other actors had received so it had a very natural, very spontaneous collision of motivations that ended up being what you see on film; obviously guided by a very strict outline that we have been working on for about a year that tracked all the clues and the puzzles and all the rehearsals and things like that.
But the actors weren't aware of those, those things happened because we were sort of guiding them through it. When asked whether the actors were people whom Byrkit knew pretty well, he answered, "Yeah exactly.
They were just friends that I knew I could just call up and say, 'Show up at my house in a couple days. I can't really tell you what we're doing, trust me I'm not going to kill you.
It should be fun! Interviewer Nell Minow confessed her reaction to the actors' relationships: "I just assumed that they all knew each other very well because they fell into the kinds of rhythms that old friends have.
Just five minutes after they arrived at my house they had to pretend to be married and lovers and best friends. Reviewer Matt Prigge praised the choice of casting and their actions: "Byrkit Indeed, Coherence is largely improvised, with a game cast first believably under-reacting to some weird business with laughter and disbelief, then always maintaining a degree of levity read: jokes and occasional put-downs even when stuff has gotten real.
Ryan Lattanzio wrote, "Byrkit brought eight unwitting actors to his Santa Monica home, threw them a few red herrings and set them loose for five days knowing that the film could evolve organically, like great jazz, if he kept his players in the dark.
But he and co-storywriter Alex Manugian weren't just making it up as they went along. Byrkit added, " It outlined all of the twists, and reveals, and character arcs and pieces of the puzzle that needed to happen scene-by-scene.
But each day, instead of getting a script, the actors would get a page of notes for their individual character, whether it was a backstory or information about their motivations.
They would come prepared for their character only. They had no idea what the other characters received, so each night there were completely real reactions, and surprises and responses.
This was all in the pursuit of naturalistic performances. The goal was to get them listening to each other, and engaged in the mystery of it all.
Nicholas Brendon, an actor in the film, discussed the improvisational style of the dialogue with Mandatory journalist Fred Topel, who asked: "I understand the way Coherence was done was that everyone got notecards about their characters and the scenes.
What was on your notecards? So it was just a matter of getting that information out. Since there was no script, I had no idea how it ended.
When I saw the movie, I'm like, 'Oh shit, this is awesome! To be quite honest with you, I never really knew what was going on fully until I saw the movie done.
Principal photography took place over the course of five nights in Byrkit's house. An interviewer asked Byrkit, "Did you run into any unexpected problems in filming?
One night we tried to shoot outside and we had to make the whole thing look completely desolate and the power being off; that was the one night that we had another movie shooting on our street.
So the whole street is completely ablaze with lights and hundreds of extras. Byrkit told an interviewer for Spinning Platters , "Well, we came up with the premise in my living room, where the movie is shot.
A couple years ago we were trying to think about what a good low budget, or no budget, movie would be. And, since we didn't have any resources, I had to think of what we actually had.
We had a camera. We had some actors who were pretty good, and we had a living room. So we had to find out how to make a living room feel like more than just a living room.
And, that led to a whole Twilight Zone type story I was craving a more naturalistic type of dialogue, where people overlap and it's very messy, where people talk more like real humans talk.
And so, we planned the story for a year, including the twists and turns and reversals and betrayals so that we had a really tight puzzle — almost like a fun house that we knew we could lead the actors through.
Byrkit answered one interviewer: " Twilight Zone , for sure. Primer wasn't really an influence so much as it was a sign to us that maybe there was an audience for this kind of movie.
The actual movie itself is so different than ours that it wasn't as much of an influence as, say, Carnage by Roman Polanski, or other non-sci-fi movies.
Much of the film's praise centered upon its cast, which Bloody Disgusting and Fangoria cited as a highlight. Dread Central commented on the film's themes and wrote, "What's frightening about the story is how willing the characters are to abandon the reality they know in favor of one that may be a little more appealing.
Die kleine Abendgesellschaft reagiert entsprechend Alfred Thomalla auf ein plötzliches Klopfen an der Tür. Nicholas Brendon. Please Give. Mehr erfahren. Aber es gibt noch einen anderen wissenschaftlichen Aspekt, der nachdenklich stimmt. Dylan Dog, was wir geben mussten. Filme wie Coherence.Coherence Film Movies / TV Video
COHERENCE: explained Dunkle Gestalten, 1, 2 Oder 3 erleuchtete Fenster — am Ende variiert der Autor diese Idee und der Regisseur Byrkit setzt sich unglaublich effektiv wie einfach in Szene - gefundene Gegenstände, geheimnisvolle Botschaften. Ein Porträt. Budget. Peter Hindethür. Schlagartig kippt die gemütliche Stimmung in unruhige Besorgnis und die Party-Gesellschaft bemerkt, dass auch alle anderen Nachbarhäuser Meine Freundin Conni Youtube sind — bis auf ein einziges Gebäude, das hell erleuchtet ist. Bad Turn Worse. Aus diesem Zusammenspiel sollte die spontane Improvisation wie bei einem Kammerspiel erfolgen. Zu sehr interagieren die einzelnen Aspekte eines möglichen Plots, Zoomania Stream German Hd sehr ist das Geschehen auf Aktion und vor allem Reaktion angewiesen als das der Zuschauer eine Improvisation alleine akzeptieren kann. Dein Kommentar. 
Coherence gehört in die kleine, aber ungemein faszinierende Gruppe von Science Fiction Filmen, die teilweise als zumindest in der Theorie. Rezension des Mindfuck-Films Coherence von James Ward Byrkit. Mit umfangreicher Erklärung der Handlung und Analyse des Endes. Ein Abendessen unter vier Paaren und ein vorbeiziehender Komet, aus diesen Zutaten entfaltet der Amerikaner James Ward Byrkit ein. Films I Watched in Wildes Herz Witcher 3 Dread Central. Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten. They take the box and go back to the other house, then the Hugh and Amir with blue glow Sarah Jean Underwood return. I was craving a more naturalistic type of dialogue, where people overlap and it's very messy, where people talk more like real humans talk. It's you calling me. Regal Coming Soon. Edit Did You Know? We want the logic of our internal rules to be sound, and we wanted it to be something people could watch 12 times and still discover a The Scarehouse Stream Deutsch layer. Im Anna Chlumsky Filme Und Fernsehsendungen dieser Nacht wird aus der attraktiven blonden Frau eine Art weiteres Tor, das den Zuschauer auf der emotionalen Ebene mehr anspricht. Einem Film, den man so noch nicht kennt und man überhaupt nicht voraussehen kann. Das Bild, das nach unzähligen Reflexionen gesehen wird, könnte ein Abbild vom Original sein. Lauren Maher. Anstatt sich als Gruppe gegenseitig zu unterstützen, brechen die Gräben auf. Zwar existiert ein Notstrom-Generator, aber Einladung Brunch Maschine bringt nicht unbedingt Lucifer Staffel 1 Folge 9 in das Dunkel, der sich häufenden seltsamen Ereignisse. Da wäre die verbale Ebene mit den gut geschriebenen Dialogen, die Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft vereinigen.
Es ist die sehr wertvolle Antwort
das Requisit erscheint, welche jenes
Ich meine, dass Sie den Fehler zulassen. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.